American Board of Trial Advocates
Best Attorneys
Multi Million Dollar
Million Dollar
Maryland Association for Justice
Super Lawyers
Awards 2015
The American
Super Lawyers
Top 50 Woman - Maryland
SuperLawyers
Top 100 - Maryland
Best Lawyers

Published on: | by

Unfortunately, it is not uncommon for the negligence of healthcare providers to harm patients. People who suffer such injuries may be able to pursue medical malpractice claims against the parties responsible for their damages and in some instances, may be able to pursue other claims as well. Regardless of the nature of their claims, they must comply with any jurisdictional and procedural requirements to avoid unintentionally waiving their rights, as discussed in a recent Maryland ruling. If you suffered losses because of the carelessness of a medical professional, you have the right to seek compensation, and you should consult a Baltimore medical malpractice attorney.

 Case Setting

It is reported that the plaintiff, acting without legal representation, filed an initial complaint against the defendant, claiming medical malpractice and negligence. She alleged that the defendant failed to provide appropriate medical care when she sought treatment for a severe asthma attack at the defendant’s emergency facility. She further claimed that this failure, motivated by racial discrimination, led to lasting health issues, including traumatic vertigo and symptoms of acute coronary artery disease. The plaintiff based her case on federal question jurisdiction but did not initially cite a specific statute.

Reportedly, the court noted that the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) might be relevant and directed the plaintiff to clarify the basis for federal jurisdiction. In response, the plaintiff amended her complaint to include an EMTALA violation along with her state-law claims of medical malpractice and neglect. The defendant then moved to dismiss the amended complaint, arguing primarily that the plaintiff’s claims were improperly presented as an EMTALA issue when they were actually state-law malpractice claims, which required arbitration before court action. The plaintiff did not respond to the motion to dismiss. Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

It is not uncommon for people to receive medical care from federally funded facilities. If the treatment rendered at such facilities hurts rather than helps patients, they may be able to pursue medical malpractice claims. Claims against the federal government can be complicated, however, as people pursuing such claims must abide by any applicable procedural rules, and if they fail to do so, their claims may be dismissed, as discussed in a recent Maryland ruling. If you were harmed by incompetent medical care, it is important to understand your rights, and you should talk to a Baltimore medical malpractice attorney promptly.

Factual and Procedural History

It is reported that the plaintiff, a patient who received treatment for suicidal ideation, initiated a lawsuit against a medical services provider and two of its employees who were responsible for his care. The plaintiff alleged that one employee failed to follow up with him as promised, and the other employee informed him that only one medication would be prescribed, and if it did not work, no further assistance would be provided. The plaintiff claimed that these failures in his medical care directly caused him continued suffering and self-harm, amounting to medical malpractice.

Allegedly, the defendants subsequently removed the case to federal court, as the medical services provider was deemed an employee of the Public Health Service (PHS) under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA). The court ordered that the United States be substituted as a defendant for the medical services provider, given its status as a PHS employee acting within the scope of its employment. The plaintiff, however, did not effectuate service on the two individual employees, either before or after the case was moved to federal court. The United States filed a motion to dismiss the case, arguing that the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction due to sovereign immunity under the FTCA and that the plaintiff failed to properly serve the individual defendants.

Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

People who pursue medical treatment are entitled to receive competent care, no matter where their treatment occurs. If the care provided is substandard, they may have grounds to pursue claims against their healthcare providers. While the location of their care does not impact the standard their treatment providers should be held to, it may impact their claims. Specifically, if care provided to people detained in federal facilities is inadequate, under certain circumstances, it may give rise to civil rights claims as well as medical malpractice claims. Generally, such claims are pursued in federal court. If the civil rights claims are subsequently dismissed, the medical malpractice claims may be dismissed as well, as demonstrated in a recent Maryland case. If you experienced harm due to inadequate medical care, it is recommended to consult with a Baltimore medical malpractice lawyer at your earliest convenience to discuss your options.

History of the Case

It is reported that the plaintiff instituted a lawsuit against the defendants, alleging civil rights violations and other claims arising out of the improper diagnosis and treatment for an injury to his right arm and shoulder. The plaintiff claimed that the physician assistant assumed without proper evaluation that his pain was due to a muscle strain and recommended daily exercises and ibuprofen. Despite persistent pain, the plaintiff was only prescribed Tylenol and Gabapentin by a doctor a month later.

The plaintiff alleged that throughout the treatment process, numerous administrative and logistical issues, including lost x-rays and delayed referrals, impeded his treatment. His condition ultimately led to surgery for three torn tendons in January 2017, which was followed by complications, including an infection due to improper postoperative care. The defendants moved to dismiss the plaintiff’s claims. As the defendants attached documents to their motion, the court treated their motion as a motion for summary judgment. Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

Generally, plaintiffs in medical malpractice cases must pursue claims against all parties at the same time. While they have the right to amend their complaints to add additional defendants, they must do so within a certain timeframe. There are exceptions for good cause, though, that allow for later amendments. Recently, a Maryland court discussed what constitutes good cause in a case in which it ultimately granted the plaintiff’s request for leave to amend. If you suffered losses due to the carelessness of your healthcare provider, you may be able to recover damages in a civil lawsuit, and you should speak to a Baltimore medical malpractice attorney.

Factual History and Procedural Setting

It is alleged that the defendant doctor performed plastic surgery on the plaintiff at the defendant hospital in June 2021. Post-surgery, the plaintiff was moved to the post-anesthesia care unit and subsequently to the medical/surgical recovery floor, where he was attended to by three physician assistants. The plaintiff alleged that the doctor and hospital staff’s negligence led to him developing bilateral compartment syndrome in his legs, resulting in over 16 surgeries and more than $4 million in medical bills. As such, in December 2022, the plaintiff filed a medical malpractice complaint against multiple defendants, including a doctor and a hospital.

Allegedly, in January 2023, the plaintiff filed an amended complaint reiterating the claims of medical malpractice against the defendant doctor, the defendant doctor’s practice, and the defendant hospital. Later, the hospital produced a document signed by the doctor indicating his supervisory role over the physician assistants. This document emerged months after the deadline for joining new parties or amending pleadings had passed. Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

People harmed by recklessly performed procedures have a right to pursue claims against the providers responsible for their harm. Under Maryland law, though, they must institute any claims within the statute of limitations. In a recent case, a Maryland court discussed the statute of limitations in medical malpractice cases, ultimately ruling that the plaintiff failed to show the statute should be tolled in his case. If you suffered losses due to the ineptitude of your healthcare provider, you may be able to recover damages in a civil lawsuit, and you should speak to a Baltimore medical malpractice attorney.

Setting of the Case

It is reported that the plaintiff, acting pro se, claimed that his treating physician failed to meet the standard of care during a procedure and subsequent care in October 2015, which resulted in injury to his bile ducts. The plaintiff alleged that a corrective surgery performed on November 20, 2015, exposed the medical malpractice by the defendants, including the physician. Subsequently, the plaintiff sought compensatory and punitive damages from the defendants. In November 2023, however, the court dismissed the plaintiff’s claims as untimely.

It is alleged that the court held that the claims were time-barred under Maryland law because the plaintiff was aware of the alleged medical negligence no later than November 2015, yet initiated the action more than five years later. The court also ruled that Maryland law did not toll the statute of limitations because the plaintiff failed to provide specific factual allegations demonstrating how the defendants’ alleged fraud kept him ignorant of his cause of action and why there was a delay in discovering the alleged fraud despite his diligence. The plaintiff subsequently sought reconsideration of the court’s decision. Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

People with critical health concerns will often seek treatment from multiple providers. Unfortunately, it is not uncommon for more than one healthcare provider to offer negligent care that ultimately harms a patient. In such instances, the injured party can pursue claims against anyone involved in the treatment that ultimately led to their harm. In many instances, plaintiffs instituting such lawsuits without the assistance of an attorney will file them in federal court. Federal courts have limited jurisdiction, though, and if a pro se plaintiff does not demonstrate that a claim falls within the court’s purview, the court will likely dismiss their claims, as demonstrated in a recent ruling. If you sustained injuries due to incompetent medical care, it is in your best interest to talk to a  Baltimore medical malpractice lawyer about your options for pursuing damages.

Factual and Procedural Background

It is alleged that the plaintiff initiated a lawsuit against the defendant medical center, which was located in Maine, and the defendant hospital, which was located in Washington DC, in federal court in August 2023. Initially, the court dismissed the complaint due to the absence of a substantial federal question. However, the court reconsidered this order upon the plaintiff’s motion, allowing him to refile the complaint with more detailed information regarding jurisdiction, legal claims, and the relief sought.

It is reported that the court gave the plaintiff until October 2023 to submit the amended complaint, but the plaintiff failed to do so. Despite not filing a new complaint, the plaintiff claimed to have served the defendants. The defendants subsequently filed motions to dismiss on various grounds, including lack of jurisdiction and failure to state a claim. Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

When children suffer harm due to negligent medical care, their parents will often pursue claims against the providers responsible for their injuries on their behalf. In doing so, the parents must ensure they comply with any applicable rules as if they fail to do so, the court might dismiss their claims, as demonstrated in a recent Maryland medical malpractice ruling. If your child suffered injuries because of the carelessness of a doctor, it is smart to confer with a Baltimore medical malpractice lawyer as soon as possible.

History of the Case

It is alleged that before the minor plaintiff’s birth, doctors identified congenital defects in her trachea and esophagus. Immediately after birth, a surgeon from a national children’s medical center operated on the minor plaintiff at a military medical center in Maryland to correct these defects. Post-surgery, the minor plaintiff experienced severe complications, prompting her transfer to a children’s hospital in Massachusetts for further surgeries.

It is reported that the plaintiffs, alleging medical negligence during the initial surgery and subsequent care at WRMC, filed suit under the Federal Tort Claims Act, naming the  military medical center and the surgeon as defendants and seeking damages against the United States. The Federal Tort Claims Act mandates that claimants exhaust administrative remedies, including presenting claims with a specified “sum certain” of damages to the federal agency involved, before suing in federal court. The defendants moved to dismiss the plaintiff mother’s claims for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

While most people harmed by medical negligence will retain an attorney to pursue claims against their providers, some choose to proceed pro se. While they have the right to do so, it is likely that they will commit procedural errors that could impact their claim, as demonstrated in a recent Maryland medical malpractice case. If you were hurt by reckless treatment, it is advisable to speak to a Baltimore medical malpractice lawyer regarding your rights.

Factual and Procedural Setting

It is reported that the plaintiff, a resident of New Jersey, filed a medical malpractice and assault lawsuit against the defendants, a hospital in Baltimore, and a urologist. The plaintiff, who was proceeding without legal representation, claimed that during his initial visit to the defendant doctor, the doctor was verbally abusive, demanding compliance with his expectations. Although the doctor later apologized, the plaintiff did not receive timely communication regarding his treatment.

Allegedly, during a subsequent appointment, the doctor made derogatory comments about the plaintiff’s profession as a chaplain and introduced an unidentified woman into the examination room. With the plaintiff’s consent, the doctor instructed the woman to perform a rectal examination, which caused the plaintiff significant distress due to past trauma, leading to severe health and emotional issues. The plaintiff initially sent a complaint letter to the hospital, which was acknowledged. He then filed the subject action. In response, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss the case on multiple grounds, including improper service and lack of jurisdiction.

Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

Veterans will often seek medical care from federally funded veterans’ organizations. If the care they receive is negligent and subsequently causes them to suffer injuries, they may be able to pursue claims against the federal government. They must comply with any applicable procedural processes, however, or it could negatively impact their claims, as discussed in a recent medical malpractice case. If you sustained harm due to incompetent medical care, you may be owed damages, and you should meet with a Baltimore medical malpractice lawyer. 

Case Setting

It is reported that the plaintiff, alleging injury due to the federal government’s veteran’s organization’s neglect of his doctor’s recommendations, filed a suit against the United States and the veteran’s organization. He claimed to suffer from Complex Regional Pain Syndrome, for which a non-veteran’s organization doctor had devised a treatment plan that included centralized care at a specialized facility. Despite recommendations from this doctor and the plaintiff’s physical therapists, the veteran’s organization allegedly did not respond, leading to a deterioration in the plaintiff’s condition.

It is alleged that the plaintiff supported his claims with exhibits showing physical symptoms, including a lower temperature in his injured leg, a sore on his injured foot, and atrophication of the injured leg. Previously, the plaintiff had filed a lawsuit in March 2018 for $5 million, which was dismissed due to the Federal Tort Claims Act’s statute of limitations. An appeal upheld this dismissal. In June 2023, the plaintiff initiated the current lawsuit, seeking $50 million in damages for future medical care and complications from delayed treatment. The defendants moved to dismiss the case. Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

People experiencing critical health concerns will often visit emergency departments with the expectation that they will receive a timely diagnosis and appropriate care. Unfortunately, that is not always the case, and delayed and missed diagnoses can lead to grave harm. As discussed in a recent Maryland medical malpractice case, a plaintiff who demonstrates a defendant’s careless delays caused them harm may be able to recover damages. If you were hurt by negligent medical care, it is wise to confer with a Baltimore medical malpractice lawyer about your rights.

History of the Case

It is reported that the plaintiff presented to the defendant hospital with symptoms of severe swelling, pain, and immobility in her left hand and arm, which progressively worsened over four days. Despite consultations and some imaging, no definitive diagnosis was made, and appropriate urgent surgical actions were not taken. On the fifth day, the plaintiff sought treatment at another medical center, where she was diagnosed and treated, but by then, significant and irreversible tissue damage had occurred.

Allegedly, the plaintiff, accompanied by her spouse, filed a lawsuit alleging medical malpractice claims against several medical professionals at the defendant hospital and the defendant hospital itself, claiming their failure to promptly diagnose and treat her necrotizing fasciitis led to permanent disability and loss of consortium. A subset of the defendants moved for summary judgment. They contended that even if their standard of care was breached, it did not cause the plaintiff’s permanent injuries. The plaintiffs opposed the motion. Continue Reading ›

Contact Information
2002 Clipper Park Rd #300
Baltimore, MD 21211
Phone: (410) 889-1850Fax: (410) 235-3297

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Please do not include any confidential or sensitive information in a contact form, text message, or voicemail. The contact form sends information by non-encrypted email, which is not secure. Submitting a contact form, sending a text message, making a phone call, or leaving a voicemail does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Copyright © 2025, Arfaa Law Group
JUSTIA Law Firm Blog Design