Baltimore Medical Malpractice Lawyer Blog

Medical malpractice cases frequently focus on whether a healthcare provider complied with the applicable standard of care. In some situations, however, disputes arise over what patients were told about the providers responsible for their treatment and whether those representations affected a patient’s legal rights. A recent Maryland decision addressed whether claims for fraudulent misrepresentation and conspiracy arising from a hospital’s alleged statements regarding a surgeon’s relationship with the hospital were barred by Maryland’s medical malpractice statute of limitations. If you suffered harm due to negligent medical care or misleading conduct by a healthcare institution, you should speak with a Baltimore medical malpractice attorney to discuss your legal options.

Facts and Procedural History

Allegedly, the plaintiff presented to a hospital emergency department in October 2015 with symptoms that led physicians to diagnose gallbladder disease. An on-call surgeon evaluated the plaintiff, confirmed the diagnosis, and recommended emergency surgery. The surgeon subsequently performed a procedure to remove the plaintiff’s gallbladder.

Reportedly, the plaintiff later underwent additional surgery at another hospital after complications developed following the initial procedure. During the course of treatment, the plaintiff learned facts that formed the basis of a medical malpractice claim against both the surgeon and the hospital. Continue Reading ›

Medical malpractice cases involving delayed cancer diagnoses often present difficult questions regarding causation, timing, and the impact of missed opportunities for treatment. When healthcare providers fail to order appropriate testing or recognize warning signs of a serious condition, patients may lose valuable time during which a disease remains more treatable. A recent Maryland decision addressed whether a patient could proceed with claims arising from an alleged delay in diagnosing parotid gland cancer. If you believe a healthcare provider failed to diagnose a serious illness in a timely manner, you should speak with a Baltimore medical malpractice attorney about your potential claims.

Factual and Procedural Setting

Allegedly, the plaintiff sought medical care after experiencing swelling, tenderness, and pain in the area near the right ear. The plaintiff had a history of thyroid cancer and underwent diagnostic evaluation, including imaging studies. Although certain abnormalities were identified, the plaintiff contended that healthcare providers failed to pursue an adequate oncological workup to determine whether cancer was present.<

Reportedly, one defendant physician evaluated the plaintiff in 2019 and attributed the symptoms to other conditions rather than parotid gland cancer. According to the plaintiff, the physician did not order additional diagnostic testing, such as a PET scan, MRI, or ultrasound, nor did the physician discuss the potential need for such studies. The plaintiff maintained that the applicable standard of care required further investigation. Continue Reading ›

Medical malpractice claims arising during extraordinary public health emergencies can present unique legal questions. Courts must often determine whether healthcare providers remain subject to traditional negligence principles when they are operating under emergency protocols designed to address widespread crises. A recent Maryland decision considered whether a hospital could invoke statutory immunity for care provided during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, even though the patient ultimately did not have the virus. If you believe negligent medical treatment caused serious harm, it is important to speak with a Baltimore medical malpractice attorney about your potential claims.

Case Setting

Allegedly, the plaintiff was admitted to a hospital in April 2020 after experiencing acute respiratory failure, breathing difficulties, and other symptoms consistent with COVID-19. Because the admission occurred during Maryland’s declared catastrophic health emergency, the hospital implemented extensive isolation precautions and treated the plaintiff as a potential COVID-19 patient while diagnostic testing was performed.

Medical malpractice cases often involve more than disputes over whether healthcare providers met the applicable standard of care. Parties frequently litigate procedural and evidentiary issues that can significantly affect the scope of a trial. A recent Maryland decision addressed whether healthcare providers could continue to maintain affirmative defenses after acknowledging that they would not pursue them before a jury. If you believe you were harmed by negligent medical treatment, it is wise to speak with a Baltimore medical malpractice attorney to understand your legal options.

Factual and Procedural History

Allegedly, the plaintiff filed a medical malpractice lawsuit against multiple healthcare providers arising from medical treatment related to a bacterial infection. The plaintiff asserted that negligent care by various providers caused substantial injuries and damages. The case proceeded through discovery and pretrial motion practice in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland.

Reportedly, the defendants filed answers to the complaint that included affirmative defenses of contributory negligence and assumption of the risk. Under Maryland law, such defenses can bar or limit recovery if supported by sufficient evidence. As the litigation progressed, however, communications between counsel revealed that the defendants no longer intended to pursue those defenses at trial. Continue Reading ›

Medical malpractice litigation often involves multiple defendants whose interests may appear aligned during trial but diverge behind the scenes. When undisclosed agreements alter those relationships, they can undermine the fairness of the proceedings and the integrity of the jury’s evaluation. A recent Maryland decision highlights the risks posed by secret settlement arrangements between plaintiffs and co-defendants, particularly in complex medical negligence cases involving hospitals and physicians. If you were harmed by medical negligence, you should speak with a Baltimore medical malpractice attorney to understand what measures to take to protect your interests.

Facts and Procedural History

Allegedly, the plaintiff filed a medical negligence action against the defendant hospital and a co-defendant physician following a birth injury that occurred during obstetrical care. The plaintiff asserted that the hospital was directly negligent through its nursing staff and vicariously liable for the physician’s conduct. The case proceeded to a jury trial lasting nearly two weeks.

It is reported that shortly after the jury was selected but before opening statements, the plaintiff disclosed the existence of an agreement with the co-defendant physician but refused to reveal its terms. The defendant hospital argued that the agreement constituted a Mary Carter agreement, requiring disclosure to both the court and the jury. The trial court declined to compel immediate disclosure and allowed the trial to proceed. Continue Reading ›

Continue Reading ›

Continue Reading ›

Medical malpractice claims involving military healthcare present unique legal challenges that often extend beyond traditional negligence analysis. When treatment occurs in military settings, statutory frameworks may significantly limit a claimant’s ability to obtain judicial review, regardless of the seriousness of the alleged medical failures. A recent decision illustrates how allegations of delayed diagnosis, inadequate treatment, and failure to respond to worsening symptoms may support claims of medical negligence, yet still be barred by governing statutes. If you were hurt by a doctor’s negligence, you should speak to a Baltimore medical malpractice attorney about your options as soon as possible.

Case Setting

Allegedly, the decedent, an active-duty service member, became ill in October 2016 while stationed aboard a naval vessel and began experiencing symptoms including fever, nausea, and progressive physical decline. Despite reporting these symptoms to medical personnel, she was required to receive a vaccination and was not provided a comprehensive evaluation or treatment.

It is alleged that over several days, the decedent repeatedly sought medical care as her condition worsened, including experiencing increasing weakness, vomiting, and loss of mobility. The decedent’s condition rapidly declined to the point of organ failure, and she was ultimately admitted for more intensive care shortly before suffering cardiac arrest and death. An official autopsy attributed the death to sepsis, while a later independent review suggested that delayed diagnosis and inadequate medical intervention contributed to the outcome. Continue Reading ›