American Board of Trial Advocates
Best Attorneys
Multi Million Dollar
Million Dollar
Maryland Association for Justice
Super Lawyers
Awards 2015
The American
Super Lawyers
Top 50 Woman - Maryland
SuperLawyers
Top 100 - Maryland
Best Lawyers

Published on: | by

Many people in Baltimore entrust the care of their loved ones to nursing homes, with the anticipating that they will receive attentive care. Sadly, many nursing home residents are neglected, and such neglect often results in significant bodily injuries. When it does, it often constitutes grounds for pursuing malpractice claims against the nursing home. In a recent Baltimore nursing home malpractice case, a jury delivered a substantial verdict for the plaintiff, demonstrating that nursing homes will be held accountable for the harm they cause. If you or a loved one sustained injuries due to the carelessness of a nursing home, it is wise to confer with a Baltimore medical malpractice attorney regarding your rights.

The Case Against the Baltimore Nursing Home

Reportedly, a Baltimore City jury awarded damages in the amount of $1.5 million to a deceased Baltimore nursing home resident’s estate in a negligence and medical malpractice lawsuit. The jury found in favor of the plaintiff, represented by the personal representative for the estate, against the nursing home, alleging negligence in the care and treatment of the deceased individual, which led to his death.

Allegedly, the complaint stated that the resident died from a bone infection caused by pressure wounds that developed due to the nursing home staff’s failure to turn and reposition him, resulting in a stage 4 pressure ulcer. The complaint also highlighted staffing concerns and allegations of negligence, including the failure to treat the resident’s wounds and implement safety precautions. The nursing home denied the allegations, attributing the resident’s health conditions to the pressure ulcer and subsequent death, but the jury ultimately rejected their arguments, finding in favor of the plaintiff. Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

Cosmetic procedures, generally, aim to improve people’s appearances. Nonetheless, they are medical treatments that must be rendered with appropriate skill and care. If they are not, complications can arise, and the responsible parties may be liable for malpractice. In many instances, it is not immediately clear who is involved in performing such procedures. Thus, it sometimes becomes necessary to amend medical malpractice complaints. In a recent Maryland ruling, the court discussed when such amendments are permitted. If you sustained harm due to an improperly performed surgical procedure, it is smart to meet with a Baltimore medical malpractice attorney to evaluate your options.

Factual and Procedural Background

It is reported that the plaintiff initiated a medical malpractice lawsuit against several parties, including the defendant doctor and the defendant hospital, after undergoing plastic surgery at the defendant hospital in June 2021. The plaintiff alleged negligence claims against the defendant doctor and the hospital’s employees, arguing their carelessness caused her to develop bilateral compartment syndrome and incur extensive medical expenses.

Allegedly, during discovery, the hospital produced a document, signed by the defendant doctor, indicating his supervisory role over physician assistants caring for his patients. The plaintiff sought to amend the complaint to assert that the defendant doctor was an ostensible agent of the hospital despite the deadline for amendments having passed. The defendant hospital opposed the motion, arguing the amendment was untimely and allowing it would be prejudicial. Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

The COVID-19 pandemic was an unprecedented event that changed most aspects of people’s lives, including their expectations with regard to medical care. Specifically, during the pandemic, Maryland passed a law providing statutory immunity to medical providers acting in good faith during the health emergency.  In a recent Maryland ruling issued in a medical malpractice case, a court discussed the parameters of this statute, ultimately dismissing the plaintiff’s claims against the defendant. If you were hurt by inadequate medical care, it is wise to meet with a Baltimore medical malpractice lawyer to weigh your potential claims.

History of the Case

It is reported that the plaintiff, who experienced medical issues at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, visited the emergency department at the defendant medical center twice in April. During the first visit, she exhibited symptoms consistent with COVID-19 and reported potential exposure to the virus. Despite this, she was not tested for COVID-19 due to the testing criteria in place at the time. On her subsequent visit three days later, she again displayed symptoms suggestive of COVID-19 but was discharged without being tested.

It is alleged that following further medical complications, the plaintiff instituted a medical malpractice lawsuit against the defendant medical center alleging negligence. The defendant medical center sought summary judgment arguing they had statutory immunity under Maryland law, as they acted in good faith under a catastrophic health emergency proclamation. The circuit court granted the defendant medical center’s motion, prompting the plaintiff ‘s appeal. Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

People housed in state and federal facilities often require medical care for chronic and acute conditions. If the care they receive is substandard and causes them harm, the provider responsible for their injuries may be deemed liable for medical malpractice. As demonstrated in a recent Maryland ruling, however, they must offer adequate proof that the provider breached the applicable standard of care, otherwise their claims may be dismissed. If you were hurt by the carelessness of a doctor, it is wise to meet with a Baltimore medical malpractice attorney to evaluate your possible claims.

Procedural and Factual History of the Case

It is alleged that the plaintiff, who was self-represented and confined to a Maryland correctional facility, filed a lawsuit against the defendants, a warden and a psychologist who worked at the facility. The plaintiff set forth numerous claims, including inadequate medical care, and sought both damages and injunctive relief.  Both defendants filed separate Motions to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment, arguing, among other things, immunity, failure to exhaust administrative remedies, and lack of personal involvement in the causing the plaintiff’s harm.

Demonstrating Harm Caused by Inadequate Medical Care

After reviewing the motions, the court found no need for a hearing. Instead, it granted the defendants’ motions, treating them as motions for summary judgment. The court began by addressing the Eleventh Amendment, determining that claims against the defendants in their official capacities were barred by sovereign immunity. Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

Generally, Marylanders expect that when they visit medical professionals for treatment of acute or chronic conditions, they will receive competent care. As demonstrated by recent data, however, medical errors are on the rise in Maryland, and patients are suffering harm as a result of the oversights and omissions of health care providers. If you suffered harm because of negligent medical care, you may be able to recover damages, and you should talk to a Baltimore medical malpractice attorney about your rights.

Increase in Medical Errors in Maryland Health Care Settings

It is reported that a recent report issued by the Maryland Department of Health’s Office of Health Care Quality demonstrated a significant increase in medical errors causing death or serious injury in Maryland hospitals during fiscal year 2022. According to the report, there were over 800 adverse events. Most of these events were classified as “Level 1,” which indicates they caused the most severe outcomes.

Allegedly, the data also revealed a more than doubling of medical errors since fiscal year 2020, raising concerns about patient safety. The spike in errors is attributed in part to the strain on the healthcare system caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. The Maryland Hospital Association also attributed some of the increase to reporting requirements and emphasized transparency. However, patient rights advocates point to possible understaffing issues as a contributing factor. Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

State and federal law aims to protect the rights of all citizens. Thus, if a party who wishes to pursue medical malpractice claims against health care providers that caused them harm lacks the means to pay the fees associated with pursuing such claims, they can ask the court to permit them to proceed in forma pauperis. Even if a court grants such a request, it may ultimately dismiss a medical malpractice claim due to the litigant’s failure to comply with the applicable rules of procedure, as demonstrated in a recent ruling issued in a Maryland medical malpractice case. If you were hurt by the incompetence of a medical professional, you should meet with a Baltimore medical malpractice attorney to determine what damages you may be able to pursue.

Case Setting

It is alleged that the plaintiff filed a pro se complaint against the defendant government agency, the United States, and the State of Maryland, alleging medical malpractice and other claims. The plaintiff, who was currently unhoused, sought leave to use a P.O. box instead of a residence address. She also moved to seal her court records, aiming to protect her P.O. Box address and private information on a USB drive sent to the Clerk of Court. Finally, she alleged she could not afford to pay the applicable legal filing fees and filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. The court approved the sealing of the USB drive and the address but ultimately dismissed the case without prejudice.

Specificity of Medical Malpractice Complaints

While the court granted the plaintiff’s various motions, it determined that the complaint, which spanned 96 pages, could not survive. In doing so, the court emphasizes the necessity for pro se litigants to adhere to the Rules of Civil Procedure. Specifically, the court highlighted that Rule 8(a) requires a clear and concise statement of jurisdictional grounds and the claim. Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

In Maryland, people harmed by incompetent medical care may seek recourse by pursuing medical malpractice claims. Before initiating such claims, they must meet certain procedural prerequisites however. If they fail to do so, their claims may be dismissed, as discussed in a recent Maryland ruling. If you or a loved one suffered harm due to medical negligence, you should contact a Baltimore medical malpractice attorney to assess what measures you can take to protect your interests.

Factual and Procedural History of the Case

It is reported that the plaintiff filed a medical malpractice lawsuit against the defendant. The plaintiff claimed that during a blood-drawing procedure conducted by a medical student, he explicitly instructed the student not to search for a vein if they could not easily find one to draw blood.

Allegedly, the student ignored this instruction and placed the needle deep into the plaintiff’s right armpit. Because of this, the plaintiff suffered increased soreness and sharp pain. Before initiating his lawsuit, the plaintiff neglected to submit his claim to the Health Claims Arbitration Office (HCAO) before initiating the lawsuit in the circuit court. Consequently, the defendant moved to dismiss the complaint, asserting that it was filed prematurely. The trial court granted the defendant’s motion, dismissing the plaintiff’s claims. The plaintiff then filed an appeal. Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

In Maryland, plaintiffs in medical malpractice cases must file a certificate of a qualified expert who attests to the defendants’ deviations from the applicable standard of care and their role as the proximate cause of the alleged injury. If a plaintiff fails to meet this requirement or their certificate is defective, their claim will most likely be dismissed. As discussed in a recent Maryland case, however, if a plaintiff files a valid certificate of a qualified expert, it cannot subsequently be deemed invalid due to the expert’s actions. If you suffered damages due to medical negligence, it is wise to meet with a Maryland medical malpractice attorney about what damages you may be able to recover.

Factual and Procedural Setting of the Case

It is reported that the decedent visited a hospital emergency room in May 2000, complaining of weakness and fatigue. The attending physician diagnosed her with mild anemia and prescribed iron supplements. Two days later, the decedent visited her primary care physician, who diagnosed her with mild congestive heart failure.

Allegedly, six days after her initial visit, the decedent was admitted to the hospital with acute abdominal pain and died later that evening. In 2002, the decedent’s daughters filed a claim against the attending physician, the primary care physician, and the hospital, alleging medical malpractice. The certifying physician identified deviations from the standard of care by the defendants. In a subsequent deposition, however, she deferred the opinion of whether the attending physician or the hospital departed from the standard. As such, the attending physician and the hospital moved for the dismissal of the claims against them on the grounds that the certificate of qualified expert was invalid. The trial court granted the motion, and the plaintiff appealed. On appeal, the intermediate court reversed the trial court ruling. The defendants then appealed. Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

Maryland’s federal court typically lacks original jurisdiction over medical malpractice matters. However, the court may exercise supplemental jurisdiction over these claims when they are part of the same case or controversy as claims that do fall within the court’s original jurisdiction. If the claims providing the original jurisdiction are dismissed, though, the federal court will often decline to retain supplemental jurisdiction over the medical malpractice claims, resulting in their dismissal as well. This was demonstrated in a recent Maryland medical malpractice case in which the court dismissed both the constitutional and state law claims asserted by the plaintiff. If you were harmed by a doctor employed by the federal government, you should talk to a Maryland medical malpractice attorney about what claims you may be able to pursue.

The Factual and Procedural History of the Case

It is alleged that the plaintiff, who was housed in a federal facility, experienced chest pains and was sent to the medical unit. Despite a history of heart problems, the defendant, a nurse, allegedly refused to provide an EKG or any treatment, violating established protocol. The plaintiff submitted an administrative remedy request, leading to an investigation confirming the nurse’s failure to follow protocol. The defendant presented the plaintiff’s medical records, showing a history of chest pain evaluations, consultations with specialists, and a recent visit where his vital signs were normal.

It is reported that the plaintiff filed a lawsuit alleging that the defendant’s neglectful actions violated his constitutional rights and amounted to medical malpractice. The defendant moved to dismiss the plaintiff’s complaint via summary judgment, arguing the plaintiff failed to offer sufficient evidence in support of his claims. Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

Members of the military typically receive care from doctors employed by the Department of Defense. If the care they receive is inadequate and causes injuries or other harm, they may be able to pursue medical malpractice claims against the federal government. As with all medical malpractice cases, such claims must be brought in a timely manner; otherwise, they will be deemed waived. In a recent medical malpractice case, a court issued an opinion discussing the timeliness of medical malpractice claims against the military, ultimately finding that the plaintiff’s claims could proceed. If you were injured by incompetent medical treatment, it is smart to talk to a Maryland medical malpractice attorney about your rights.

Case History

Allegedly, the defendant performed a surgical procedure on the plaintiff. The plaintiff suffered complications, which led to multiple admissions and additional surgeries. The plaintiff subsequently filed a medical malpractice and informed consent claim against the defendant, alleging that the defendant breached the standard of care during knee surgery and failed to obtain informed consent.

It is reported that during the trial, the plaintiff’s expert witness testified that the defendant breached the national standard of care by opting for aggressive surgery when less invasive options were available. The jury ruled in favor of the plaintiff on the malpractice claim but rejected the informed consent claim. The defendant then moved for judgment in his favor as a matter of law, arguing that the plaintiff’s expert witness lacked a basis for knowledge of the national standard of care. The court denied the defendant’s motion, and the defendant appealed. Continue Reading ›

Contact Information
2002 Clipper Park Rd #300
Baltimore, MD 21211
Phone: (410) 889-1850Fax: (410) 235-3297

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Please do not include any confidential or sensitive information in a contact form, text message, or voicemail. The contact form sends information by non-encrypted email, which is not secure. Submitting a contact form, sending a text message, making a phone call, or leaving a voicemail does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Copyright © 2024, Arfaa Law Group
JUSTIA Law Firm Blog Design