American Board of Trial Advocates
Best Attorneys
Multi Million Dollar
Million Dollar
Maryland Association for Justice
Super Lawyers
Awards 2015
The American
Super Lawyers
Top 50 Woman - Maryland
SuperLawyers
Top 100 - Maryland
Best Lawyers

Published on: | by

Pursuant to Maryland law, a plaintiff that wishes to pursue medical malpractice claims must comply with the requirements of the Maryland Health Care Malpractice Claims Act (the Act). Among other things, Act requires plaintiffs to file a statement of a qualified expert prior to proceeding with civil claims. While the failure to do so used to be fatal to medical malpractice claims filed in federal court, an intervening change in the law dictates that courts can no longer dismiss a plaintiff’s claims due to their failure to serve an expert certificate prior to suing. The impact of the ruling was discussed by the Maryland district court in a matter in which it ultimately reinstated the plaintiff’s medical malpractice claims. If you suffered harm due to the carelessness of a healthcare provider, you should meet with a Maryland medical malpractice lawyer to discuss what damages you may be owed.

Background of the Case

It is reported that the decedent filed a medical malpractice complaint against the defendants in January 2019, alleging he received inadequate treatment for various conditions when he was housed in a state facility. Following the decedent’s death, the representative of his estate was substituted as the plaintiff. In turn, she asserted that the treatment offered to the decedent fell below the standard of care. The defendant moved to dismiss the plaintiff’s medical malpractice claims, and the court granted their motion. The plaintiff then filed a motion for reconsideration.

Maryland Medical Malpractice Claims Filed in Federal Court

Due to an intervening change in the law between the time the previous order was issued and the plaintiff’s filing of the motion for reconsideration, the court granted the motion. The court explained that it originally dismissed the plaintiff’s medical malpractice claims because she failed to satisfy the requirements of the Act. Namely, she failed to file a certificate of a qualified expert that set forth how a defendant’s deviation from the accepted standard of care caused the plaintiff’s harm, and neglected to submit her claims to arbitration or properly waive arbitration. Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

College athletes generally accept the risk that they may suffer injuries in a game. If an injured student receives incompetent medical care, their injuries may become exacerbated. Simply because a student waives the right to seek damages from a university for harm suffered while playing a sport does not mean they cannot pursue claims against a negligent health care provider that treats them after their injury, as demonstrated in a recent Maryland ruling. If you sustained injuries because of inadequate care you received in a hospital, you should consult a Maryland medical malpractice attorney to determine what claims you may be able to pursue.

Background of the Case

It is reported that the plaintiff played field hockey for the university she attended. During a game, she sustained a blow to the head. She subsequently sought treatment at a military primary care facility, where she was diagnosed with sinusitis. Her symptoms lingered, however, and she was eventually diagnosed with a concussion and post-concussive syndrome. She then filed a lawsuit naming the federal government as the defendant. In her complaint, she alleged that the doctor that treated her at the facility was negligent, and the government was vicariously liable for the harm caused by the doctor. The case proceeded to a bench trial.

The Court’s Findings

One of the primary issues at trial was whether the defendant could be held vicariously liable for the acts of the doctor that treated the plaintiff. The court noted that there was ample evidence that the treating physician breached the applicable standard of care and that the breach proximately caused the plaintiff’s harm. Specifically, he neglected to perform tests to determine if the plaintiff suffered a concussion or preclude her from playing in games or practice until her symptoms abated and his omissions proximately caused the plaintiff to suffer harm. Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

Under Maryland law, a plaintiff pursuing medical malpractice claims must comply with certain prerequisites. For example, they must file a statement of claim, certificate of qualified expert and report, and claim form with the Maryland Health Claims Alternative Dispute Resolution Office (HCADRO) within six months of the date of harm. As recently discussed by a Maryland court, however, the failure to do so will not automatically result in the dismissal of the plaintiff’s claims against the federal government in federal court. If you sustained losses due to a careless physician, you should meet with a Maryland medical malpractice attorney to discuss what steps you must take to protect your rights.

Background of the Case

It is alleged that the plaintiff, a veteran, sought treatment from a federally owned military hospital for plantar warts on his foot. He underwent a surgical removal of the warts after which he experienced extreme pain. His symptoms would not abate despite continuous treatment. He subsequently file an administrative claim related to his care with the Navy.

Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

The duties and standards of care imposed on medical professionals are not within the understanding of the average person. As such, in most Maryland medical malpractice cases, the plaintiff will need to hire an expert to explain such matters to the jury and to establish causation. There are requirements a person must meet to qualify to testify as an expert, though, as discussed in a recent Maryland ruling. If you were hurt by a negligent doctor, you should speak to a trusted Maryland medical malpractice attorney about what evidence you must produce to recover damages.

The Plaintiff’s Harm

It is alleged that the defendant surgically extracted the plaintiff’s wisdom teeth. Prior to the procedure, the defendant advised the plaintiff she may experience complications, including numbness and tingling. After the surgery, the plaintiff could not speak or move her tongue. She was advised that her condition would improve over time, but it did not. She still had paresthesia at her follow-up appointment weeks later.

Reportedly, six months after the surgery, the plaintiff was treated by a different oral surgeon who diagnosed her with neurotmesis. The plaintiff filed a medical malpractice lawsuit against the defendant and named two experts who would provide expert testimony on her behalf. The defendant argued that the plaintiff’s experts’ testimony was inadmissible and, therefore, judgment should be entered in his favor as a matter of law. The court granted his motion, and the plaintiff appealed. Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

Doctors often make patients sign consent forms before they render treatment. Many people sign such forms without reading the terms, which in some cases results in the unwitting waiver of the right to pursue claims against the doctor. Merely because a party signs a blanket waiver does not automatically mean they will be precluded from filing medical malpractice claims, though, as demonstrated in a recent Maryland case. If you suffered harm due to a carelessly performed procedure, you have the right to seek compensation, and you should speak to a trusted Maryland medical malpractice lawyer about your potential claims.

The Facts and History of the Case

It is alleged that the plaintiff sought treatment from the defendant due to blurry vision. The defendant asked the plaintiff a few questions but only performed a cursory examination. The plaintiff returned to the defendant’s office three weeks later with similar complaints. The defendant examined him and determined he was suffering from a detached retina and needed emergency surgery.

It is reported that the plaintiff underwent the procedure but suffered permanent injuries in his left eye. He subsequently filed a medical malpractice lawsuit against the defendant. The defendant removed the case to federal court and then filed a motion to dismiss or alternatively a motion for summary judgment. Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

It is not uncommon for Maryland hospitals to hire doctors to work as independent contractors in their emergency rooms. If such physicians make mistakes that ultimately make mistakes that harm patients, the hospital typically will not be held vicariously liable for the doctor’s negligence. There are exceptions, though, such as liability based on the doctrine of apparent agency, as demonstrated in a recent Maryland medical malpractice case. If you were injured due to negligent care in a hospital setting, you might be owed damages, and it is prudent to meet with a Maryland medical malpractice lawyer to determine your possible claims.

Facts of the Case

It is reported that the plaintiff visited the defendant hospital’s emergency room following a motorcycle collision that caused him to suffer critical harm. While at the hospital, he suffered further injuries due to the negligence of the trauma surgeon that operated on him. The plaintiff filed a lawsuit seeking damages from both the surgeon, for medical malpractice and the hospital, for vicarious liability.

Allegedly, the hospital argued that it could not be vicariously liable for the acts of the surgeon as he was an independent contractor, not an employee.  The case proceeded to trial, and the jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, finding that the surgeon was an agent of the hospital and the hospital was vicariously liable for his negligence. The hospital moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, and the court granted the motion. The plaintiff appealed. Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

While many people undergo surgery without any complications, there are risks associated with most procedures, and problems that arise during what seems like a routine procedure can result in lifelong impairment. To ensure that their patients adequately understand the potential issues that they could face, doctors have an obligation to advise patients of the potential consequences of surgery prior to getting their permission to proceed. If they fail to do so, they may be liable for the failure to obtain informed consent, as demonstrated in a recent opinion issued in a Maryland medical malpractice case. If you suffered harm due to the negligence of a doctor, it is smart to talk to a Maryland medical malpractice lawyer about your potential claims.

Factual and Procedural Background of the Case

It is reported that the plaintiffs’ infant son underwent a routine tonsil removal and bilateral implantation of tubes in his ears. During the surgery, the infant went into cardiac arrest and suffered a lack of oxygen to the brain, causing him to suffer permanent brain damage. The plaintiffs subsequently instituted a medical malpractice lawsuit against the defendants, the doctors who performed the surgery, pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act.

Allegedly, they asserted, in part, a lack of informed consent claim in which they alleged that the defendants failed to disclose the material consequences and risks associated with the surgery in consideration of the fact that the infant had sickle cell anemia and reactive airway disease. The court subsequently set forth findings of fact and conclusions of law. Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

For various reasons, many medical malpractice cases never proceed to trial; some are settled while others are resolved via summary judgment. Either party can seek a summary judgment and the burden of proof is the same for both plaintiffs and defendants. Recently, a Maryland court discussed what a party must prove to obtain judgment in their favor as a matter of law in a dental malpractice case. If you were harmed by a negligent dentist, you should meet with a trusted Maryland dental malpractice lawyer to discuss what damages you may be owed.

The Facts of the Case

It is reported that the plaintiff presented to the defendant’s office for potential treatment of dentition. The defendant’s employee discussed a treatment that would entail the removal of her remaining upper teeth and the use of a prosthesis that would be fitted onto dental implants in place of the teeth. The plaintiff consented to the procedure, even though she did not speak to an actual dentist during the visit.

Allegedly, the plaintiff underwent the procedure, after which she experienced poor fit, breakage, and loosening, among other things. The plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the defendant, asserting claims of dental malpractice. After the completion of discovery, the defendant moved for summary judgment. Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

Doctors accused of committing medical malpractice will often try to avoid liability by claiming factors other than their negligence caused their patients harm. For example, they may argue that an outside force intervened and brought about the injury in question, thereby superseding their fault. Recently, a Maryland court examined superseding and intervening causes in a medical malpractice case in which the defendant relied on the defense to avoid liability. If you were harmed by the negligence of a doctor, you might be owed compensation, and you should speak to an assertive Maryland medical malpractice lawyer about your possible claims.

Facts of the Case

It is alleged that the decedent visited the defendant, an anesthesiologist and pain management doctor, for treatment of chronic pain in her neck and arm. The defendant administered an epidural steroid injection to the plaintiff. In the week after the injection, the decedent began experiencing double vision, balance issues, nausea, and vomiting.  She was admitted to the hospital but rapidly declined, and she passed away approximately two weeks after the injection.

Reportedly, the decedent’s cause of death was determined to be fungal meningitis. The plaintiff filed a medical malpractice lawsuit against the defendant, arguing that she negligently used drugs from a compounding pharmacy and that such drugs caused the decedent’s illness and eventual demise. The defendant argued that the pharmacy’s conduct was a superseding and intervening cause of the decedent’s death and requested a jury instruction on such causes. The court granted her request, and the jury ultimately found that the defendant was negligent, but the pharmacy’s acts were the superseding and intervening cause of the decedent’s death. The plaintiff appealed. Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

Advances in medicine have greatly improved the treatment options for many people suffering from cancer. A prompt diagnosis is key to a good prognosis, however. Thus, missed or delayed diagnosis often negatively impacts a person’s health and long-term survival rates, and doctors that fail to diagnose their patients with cancer may be liable for medical malpractice. Recently, a Maryland court discussed what evidence a plaintiff must offer to establish that a delayed diagnosis caused actual harm, in a matter in which it ultimately dismissed the plaintiff’s claims. If you or a loved one suffered losses due to a doctor’s failure to offer a timely diagnosis, it is smart to meet with a Maryland medical malpractice lawyer to discuss your rights.

The Facts of the Case

It is reported that the decedent presented to the emergency department of a hospital in May 2015 with complaints of back pain, abdominal pain, and nausea. He underwent an examination and diagnostic imaging. The results of his tests were reviewed by the defendant, who determined that no abnormalities were present. The decedent was diagnosed with pancreatitis and discharged.

Allegedly, in November 2015, the decedent returned to the emergency department with complaints of abdominal pain, and additional images of his abdomen were obtained. Upon review of the images, the treating doctor observed a pancreatic body mass. The decedent was diagnosed with pancreatic cancer and died the following month. The plaintiff, as representative of the decedent’s estate, filed a medical malpractice lawsuit against the defendant, arguing that his failure to diagnose the decedent caused measurable harm. The defendant moved for summary judgment, and the court granted his motion. The plaintiff appealed. Continue Reading ›

Contact Information
2002 Clipper Park Rd #300
Baltimore, MD 21211
Phone: (410) 889-1850Fax: (410) 235-3297

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Please do not include any confidential or sensitive information in a contact form, text message, or voicemail. The contact form sends information by non-encrypted email, which is not secure. Submitting a contact form, sending a text message, making a phone call, or leaving a voicemail does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Copyright © 2024, Arfaa Law Group
JUSTIA Law Firm Blog Design