Generally, plaintiffs in medical malpractice cases must pursue claims against all parties at the same time. While they have the right to amend their complaints to add additional defendants, they must do so within a certain timeframe. There are exceptions for good cause, though, that allow for later amendments. Recently, a Maryland court discussed what constitutes good cause in a case in which it ultimately granted the plaintiff’s request for leave to amend. If you suffered losses due to the carelessness of your healthcare provider, you may be able to recover damages in a civil lawsuit, and you should speak to a Baltimore medical malpractice attorney.
Factual History and Procedural Setting
It is alleged that the defendant doctor performed plastic surgery on the plaintiff at the defendant hospital in June 2021. Post-surgery, the plaintiff was moved to the post-anesthesia care unit and subsequently to the medical/surgical recovery floor, where he was attended to by three physician assistants. The plaintiff alleged that the doctor and hospital staff’s negligence led to him developing bilateral compartment syndrome in his legs, resulting in over 16 surgeries and more than $4 million in medical bills. As such, in December 2022, the plaintiff filed a medical malpractice complaint against multiple defendants, including a doctor and a hospital.
Allegedly, in January 2023, the plaintiff filed an amended complaint reiterating the claims of medical malpractice against the defendant doctor, the defendant doctor’s practice, and the defendant hospital. Later, the hospital produced a document signed by the doctor indicating his supervisory role over the physician assistants. This document emerged months after the deadline for joining new parties or amending pleadings had passed.
Reportedly, the plaintiff filed a motion to amend the complaint five days after receiving this document, aiming to establish that the doctor was an ostensible/apparent agent of the hospital. The hospital opposed this motion, arguing that it was unduly prejudicial and futile.
Grounds for Granting Leave to Amend a Medical Malpractice Complaint
The court evaluated the motion under the “good cause” standard of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b)(4) and the standard of Rule 15(a)(2) for amending pleadings. Good cause requires demonstrating that deadlines could not be met despite diligence. The court found that the plaintiff had acted diligently, as he filed the motion promptly after discovering new information from the hospital’s document production. This justified the missed deadline, meeting the good cause standard.
Next, the court applied the Rule 15(a) standard, which allows for amendments when justice requires. The court was not persuaded by the hospital’s claim that the amendment was prejudicial. The plaintiff’s prompt filing of the motion after discovering new evidence and the ongoing nature of discovery mitigated any potential prejudice. The court noted that the hospital could re-open depositions related to the new claim, which would not fundamentally alter the nature of the litigation.
The court also dismissed the hospital’s argument that the amendment was futile. An amendment is considered futile only if it is clearly insufficient or frivolous. The hospital’s contention centered on the merits of the plaintiff’s claim, which the court determined should be evaluated by a jury rather than dismissed as futile at this stage. The court found no indication that the plaintiff’s proposed amendment was frivolous.
Given the broad discretion to grant leave to amend when justice requires and the absence of futility or undue prejudice, the court ruled that the plaintiff’s motion to amend the complaint was warranted. Thus, the court granted the plaintiff’s motion to amend the complaint.
Seek Advice from a Knowledgeable Maryland Medical Malpractice Attorney
If you were harmed due to the oversight of your healthcare provider, you may be entitled to damages, and you should seek advice from an attorney about the claims you could pursue. The knowledgeable Baltimore medical malpractice lawyers at Arfaa Law Group can evaluate your case and help you seek the maximum compensation available. To schedule a consultation, reach out to us through our online form or call (410) 889-1850.