Published by Arfaa Law Group
Maryland law allows people harmed by medical errors to seek compensation, but in order to demonstrate fault, they usually must offer expert testimony. However, in cases where the court deems expert testimony to lack a sound scientific basis, it may preclude such testimony from impacting the verdict. Recently, a court issued an opinion highlighting the standards courts apply to ensure the reliability of expert witnesses in cases involving allegations of medical negligence. If you believe you have been harmed due to a healthcare provider’s negligence, you should consult with a Baltimore medical malpractice lawyer promptly.
Case Setting
It is reported that the plaintiff sought to hold the defendant accountable for alleged medical errors after undergoing treatment that resulted in significant injuries. The plaintiff claimed that the defendant’s failure to follow established medical protocols during surgery led to her injuries, including long-term complications. As part of her case, the plaintiff introduced testimony from a medical expert who argued that the healthcare provider had deviated from the standard of care.
Allegedly, however, the defendant contested the admissibility of this testimony, asserting that the expert’s claims were speculative and lacked a factual basis. The trial court granted the defendant’s motion to exclude the expert’s testimony, finding that the opinions were not grounded in scientifically recognized standards. Without this testimony, the plaintiff was unable to substantiate her claims, leading the court to dismiss the case. The plaintiff appealed, challenging the exclusion of her expert’s testimony.
Admissibility of Expert Testimony in Maryland Medical Malpractice Cases
On appeal, the court evaluated whether the trial court had appropriately excluded the expert’s testimony under Maryland’s rules governing expert evidence. In its analysis, the court applied the Frye-Reed standard, which requires expert testimony to be based on methods that are generally accepted within the relevant scientific community.
The court examined the expert’s testimony, noting that the expert failed to cite studies or established medical guidelines to support their assertions regarding the defendant’s alleged deviation from the standard of care. As a result, the court agreed with the trial court’s determination that the expert’s opinions lacked a reliable foundation.
The court reiterated that under the applicable law, expert testimony in medical malpractice cases must meet high evidentiary standards to prevent juries from relying on speculative conclusions. By excluding unreliable expert testimony, the court emphasized that the integrity of the judicial process is maintained, and patients’ rights to pursue viable claims are preserved.
Consequently, the court affirmed the trial court’s decision to exclude the expert testimony and upheld the dismissal of the plaintiff’s case.
Talk to an Experienced Baltimore Medical Malpractice Lawyer
If you believe that you or a loved one were injured by medical negligence, it is important to understand what evidence you will need to produce to recover damages, and you should talk to an attorney. The experienced Baltimore medical malpractice attorneys at Arfaa Law Group are dedicated to helping clients navigate the complexities of medical malpractice cases, and if we represent you, we will work tirelessly on your behalf. To arrange a consultation, you can reach us through our online form or by calling (410) 889-1850.