American Board of Trial Advocates
Best Attorneys
Multi Million Dollar
Million Dollar
Maryland Association for Justice
Super Lawyers
Awards 2015
The American
Super Lawyers
Top 50 Woman - Maryland
SuperLawyers
Top 100 - Maryland
Best Lawyers

Published on: | by

Medical malpractice cases involving delayed cancer diagnoses often present difficult questions regarding causation, timing, and the impact of missed opportunities for treatment. When healthcare providers fail to order appropriate testing or recognize warning signs of a serious condition, patients may lose valuable time during which a disease remains more treatable. A recent Maryland decision addressed whether a patient could proceed with claims arising from an alleged delay in diagnosing parotid gland cancer. If you believe a healthcare provider failed to diagnose a serious illness in a timely manner, you should speak with a Baltimore medical malpractice attorney about your potential claims.

Factual and Procedural Setting

Allegedly, the plaintiff sought medical care after experiencing swelling, tenderness, and pain in the area near the right ear. The plaintiff had a history of thyroid cancer and underwent diagnostic evaluation, including imaging studies. Although certain abnormalities were identified, the plaintiff contended that healthcare providers failed to pursue an adequate oncological workup to determine whether cancer was present.<

Reportedly, one defendant physician evaluated the plaintiff in 2019 and attributed the symptoms to other conditions rather than parotid gland cancer. According to the plaintiff, the physician did not order additional diagnostic testing, such as a PET scan, MRI, or ultrasound, nor did the physician discuss the potential need for such studies. The plaintiff maintained that the applicable standard of care required further investigation. Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

Medical malpractice claims arising during extraordinary public health emergencies can present unique legal questions. Courts must often determine whether healthcare providers remain subject to traditional negligence principles when they are operating under emergency protocols designed to address widespread crises. A recent Maryland decision considered whether a hospital could invoke statutory immunity for care provided during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, even though the patient ultimately did not have the virus. If you believe negligent medical treatment caused serious harm, it is important to speak with a Baltimore medical malpractice attorney about your potential claims.

Case Setting

Allegedly, the plaintiff was admitted to a hospital in April 2020 after experiencing acute respiratory failure, breathing difficulties, and other symptoms consistent with COVID-19. Because the admission occurred during Maryland’s declared catastrophic health emergency, the hospital implemented extensive isolation precautions and treated the plaintiff as a potential COVID-19 patient while diagnostic testing was performed.

Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

Medical malpractice cases often involve more than disputes over whether healthcare providers met the applicable standard of care. Parties frequently litigate procedural and evidentiary issues that can significantly affect the scope of a trial. A recent Maryland decision addressed whether healthcare providers could continue to maintain affirmative defenses after acknowledging that they would not pursue them before a jury. If you believe you were harmed by negligent medical treatment, it is wise to speak with a Baltimore medical malpractice attorney to understand your legal options.

Factual and Procedural History

Allegedly, the plaintiff filed a medical malpractice lawsuit against multiple healthcare providers arising from medical treatment related to a bacterial infection. The plaintiff asserted that negligent care by various providers caused substantial injuries and damages. The case proceeded through discovery and pretrial motion practice in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland.

Reportedly, the defendants filed answers to the complaint that included affirmative defenses of contributory negligence and assumption of the risk. Under Maryland law, such defenses can bar or limit recovery if supported by sufficient evidence. As the litigation progressed, however, communications between counsel revealed that the defendants no longer intended to pursue those defenses at trial. Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

Medical malpractice litigation often involves multiple defendants whose interests may appear aligned during trial but diverge behind the scenes. When undisclosed agreements alter those relationships, they can undermine the fairness of the proceedings and the integrity of the jury’s evaluation. A recent Maryland decision highlights the risks posed by secret settlement arrangements between plaintiffs and co-defendants, particularly in complex medical negligence cases involving hospitals and physicians. If you were harmed by medical negligence, you should speak with a Baltimore medical malpractice attorney to understand what measures to take to protect your interests.

Facts and Procedural History

Allegedly, the plaintiff filed a medical negligence action against the defendant hospital and a co-defendant physician following a birth injury that occurred during obstetrical care. The plaintiff asserted that the hospital was directly negligent through its nursing staff and vicariously liable for the physician’s conduct. The case proceeded to a jury trial lasting nearly two weeks.

It is reported that shortly after the jury was selected but before opening statements, the plaintiff disclosed the existence of an agreement with the co-defendant physician but refused to reveal its terms. The defendant hospital argued that the agreement constituted a Mary Carter agreement, requiring disclosure to both the court and the jury. The trial court declined to compel immediate disclosure and allowed the trial to proceed. Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

Medical malpractice claims involving treatment within federal systems often present complex procedural barriers that can limit recovery even where negligent care may have occurred. When a government agency delays or fails to act on a malpractice claim, injured parties may seek judicial intervention, but strict legal standards can prevent meaningful relief despite apparent wrongdoing. A recent Maryland decision highlights how procedural doctrines can restrict a claimant’s ability to recover attorney’s fees, even when a lawsuit prompts agency action on an underlying medical negligence claim. If you or a loved one has been harmed by negligent medical care connected to a government provider, you should speak with a Baltimore medical malpractice attorney to evaluate your options.

Case Setting

Allegedly, the plaintiff filed a civil action against the defendant, a federal official, asserting that a government agency failed to act on a medical malpractice claim brought on behalf of her child under a federal statutory scheme. The complaint sought relief under the Administrative Procedure Act, alleging that the agency’s inaction warranted judicial intervention.

It is reported that after the plaintiff initiated the lawsuit, the defendant moved to dismiss the complaint or, alternatively, for summary judgment. The plaintiff did not oppose the motion to dismiss but instead asserted that the lawsuit had effectively achieved its purpose by prompting the agency to respond to the underlying malpractice claim. Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

Medical malpractice cases often arise from split-second decisions in the operating room, where a physician’s failure to recognize and correct a preventable error can transform a routine procedure into a life-altering event. Even when a complication is known and manageable, the failure to act appropriately can expose patients to catastrophic harm and long-term consequences. A recent Maryland jury verdict illustrates how an uncorrected surgical mistake can escalate into severe complications, including sepsis and permanent impairment, ultimately supporting a substantial malpractice award. If you or a loved one suffered harm due to a surgical error, you should speak with a Baltimore medical malpractice attorney to assess your potential claims.

Facts and Procedural History

Allegedly, the plaintiff underwent surgery to repair a hiatal hernia after presenting to the hospital with abdominal and chest pain. During the procedure, the defendant surgeon performed a robotic operation intended to correct the hernia.

It is alleged that during the surgery, the surgeon created a perforation in the patient’s stomach but failed to identify and repair the injury before completing the procedure. The complication was one that medical professionals recognize as a known risk of the surgery but also one that can typically be corrected if detected in time.

Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

Medical malpractice claims arising from care provided in correctional settings often involve more than questions of negligence, as they may also implicate constitutional protections and systemic failures in medical delivery. When incarcerated individuals depend on consistent treatment for serious conditions, even short lapses in care can lead to devastating outcomes. A recent Maryland decision demonstrates how failures to provide essential medication and monitoring in a custodial setting may support both malpractice and constitutional claims, particularly where institutional practices contribute to inadequate care. If you or a loved one has suffered injury due to negligent medical care in a correctional facility, you should speak with a Baltimore medical malpractice attorney to explore your potential claims.

History of the Case

Allegedly, the plaintiff, acting on behalf of the decedent, filed suit against medical providers and county entities, asserting that the decedent suffered severe complications due to inadequate medical care while incarcerated. The decedent had a known heart condition requiring strict adherence to a daily anticoagulant regimen to prevent blood clot formation.

It is reported that upon entering custody, the decedent disclosed his condition and medication requirements to medical personnel. Despite this, there were delays in initiating treatment, inconsistent dosing, and failures to provide necessary monitoring. The decedent experienced interruptions in receiving medication, including multiple days without required doses during a transfer between detention facilities.

Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

Medical malpractice litigation often turns not only on clinical facts but also on procedural and evidentiary rules that determine whether a claim can proceed to trial. A recent Maryland decision highlights how expert witness qualifications and trial rulings can shape the outcome of complex negligence claims involving multiple healthcare providers. If you were harmed by negligent medical care, it is smart to speak to a Baltimore medical malpractice attorney to protect your rights.

Case Setting

Allegedly, the decedent underwent an upper endoscopy at an outpatient surgical facility and was discharged shortly after the procedure, despite multiple health conditions that could increase fall risk. After leaving the facility, the decedent fell outside while walking to a vehicle and later suffered complications that led to death.

It is alleged that the plaintiffs filed a medical negligence and wrongful death action against several healthcare providers and the facility, asserting that the defendants failed to properly assess fall risk, failed to monitor the patient adequately, and discharged the patient without appropriate assistance, such as a wheelchair. The plaintiffs supported their claims with expert certifications from physicians who opined that the defendants deviated from the applicable standards of care and that those deviations caused the decedent’s injuries and death. Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

Medical malpractice claims involving military healthcare present unique legal challenges that often extend beyond traditional negligence analysis. When treatment occurs in military settings, statutory frameworks may significantly limit a claimant’s ability to obtain judicial review, regardless of the seriousness of the alleged medical failures. A recent decision illustrates how allegations of delayed diagnosis, inadequate treatment, and failure to respond to worsening symptoms may support claims of medical negligence, yet still be barred by governing statutes. If you were hurt by a doctor’s negligence, you should speak to a Baltimore medical malpractice attorney about your options as soon as possible.

Case Setting

Allegedly, the decedent, an active-duty service member, became ill in October 2016 while stationed aboard a naval vessel and began experiencing symptoms including fever, nausea, and progressive physical decline. Despite reporting these symptoms to medical personnel, she was required to receive a vaccination and was not provided a comprehensive evaluation or treatment.

It is alleged that over several days, the decedent repeatedly sought medical care as her condition worsened, including experiencing increasing weakness, vomiting, and loss of mobility. The decedent’s condition rapidly declined to the point of organ failure, and she was ultimately admitted for more intensive care shortly before suffering cardiac arrest and death. An official autopsy attributed the death to sepsis, while a later independent review suggested that delayed diagnosis and inadequate medical intervention contributed to the outcome. Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

Medical malpractice claims frequently depend not only on the quality of care provided but also on strict procedural requirements that govern when and how such claims may be brought. A recent Maryland ruling illustrates how delays in diagnosis and treatment, combined with alleged failures in care coordination, can raise significant negligence concerns and trigger threshold legal barriers. If you believe you have suffered harm due to delayed or inadequate medical treatment, you should consult with experienced Baltimore medical malpractice attorneys to evaluate your legal options.

Facts and Procedural History

Allegedly, the plaintiff sustained a serious musculoskeletal injury while engaging in physical activity, resulting in a torn pectoralis muscle that required prompt medical evaluation and potential surgical intervention. The plaintiff asserted that medical providers failed to timely diagnose the severity of the injury and delayed appropriate treatment.

It is alleged that initial medical evaluations mischaracterized the injury, and although a provider later recognized the likelihood of a significant tendon disruption, necessary follow-up care and specialist referrals were not promptly implemented. The plaintiff claimed that diagnostic testing, including imaging studies, was significantly delayed, and that recommended treatments, such as physical therapy and ultrasound, were not timely ordered or performed. Continue Reading ›

Contact Information
2002 Clipper Park Rd #300
Baltimore, MD 21211
Phone: (410) 889-1850Fax: (410) 235-3297

Please do not include any confidential or sensitive information in a contact form, text message, or voicemail. The contact form sends information by non-encrypted email, which is not secure. Submitting a contact form, sending a text message, making a phone call, or leaving a voicemail does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Copyright © 2026, Arfaa Law Group
JUSTIA Law Firm Blog Design