American Board of Trial Advocates
Best Attorneys
Multi Million Dollar
Million Dollar
Maryland Association for Justice
Super Lawyers
Awards 2015
The American
Super Lawyers
Top 50 Woman - Maryland
SuperLawyers
Top 100 - Maryland
Best Lawyers

Published on: | by

Maryland applies its choice of law rule, lex loci delicti, which mandates that the substantive law of the place where the injury occurs governs cases involving tort claims. In medical malpractice cases where the injury or malpractice occurred out of state, Maryland courts must determine whether local or out-of-state laws, including damages caps, are applicable. For example, a recent case examined Maryland’s approach to determining the appropriate damages cap for a plaintiff injured by an out-of-state healthcare provider. If you believe you were injured due to medical negligence, it is wise to consult a Baltimore medical malpractice attorney to help you understand your legal options.

Facts and Procedure

It is alleged that the plaintiff, who resides in Maryland, sought liposuction services from the defendant, a Virginia-based medical provider, at an office located in Alexandria, Virginia. Reportedly, the plaintiff underwent the procedure in Virginia, after which she returned home to Maryland, where she soon developed severe complications, including infections that led to permanent physical and emotional injuries. It is alleged that during the procedure, the defendant administered insufficient pain relief and prescribed inadequate post-operative care, which contributed to the plaintiff’s prolonged suffering.

It is reported that the plaintiff filed a lawsuit in Maryland, asserting claims of medical negligence and lack of informed consent, seeking damages for her injuries. The jury awarded substantial damages, including non-economic damages for pain and suffering. However, the court later reduced the award to comply with Maryland’s cap on non-economic damages, applying the state’s limitation on such awards in malpractice claims. The plaintiff appealed, contending that Virginia’s higher damages cap should apply since the medical procedure occurred in Virginia, and the tort, therefore, arose there. Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

Maryland healthcare providers are expected to provide patients with competent care, which includes informing them of the risks associated with prescribed treatments. While state courts typically oversee medical malpractice cases, federal courts may exercise jurisdiction over these state law claims in certain situations, such as when they are filed along with federal question claims. If claims granting a court subject matter jurisdiction are dismissed, though, it may subsequently result in the dismissal of state law medical malpractice claims as well, as shown in a recent Maryland case. If you were injured due to inadequate medical care or lack of informed consent, speaking with a Maryland medical malpractice attorney can help clarify your legal options.

Factual and Procedural Background

It is alleged that the plaintiff, an inmate in a Maryland state correctional facility, filed a federal lawsuit asserting medical malpractice and lack of informed consent against healthcare providers at Jessup Correctional Institution. The plaintiff reportedly claimed that his medical team failed to inform him of the seizure risks associated with Tramadol, a medication prescribed to manage his chronic pain due to Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT).

It is reported that Tramadol, which was initially discontinued due to seizure risk, was reinstated by the institution’s Pain Committee following a review that determined its pain management benefits outweighed the risks. Despite this, the plaintiff allegedly suffered a seizure that required hospitalization and led to a diagnosis necessitating lifelong anti-seizure medication. The plaintiff filed his case in federal court, alleging that the lack of informed consent for Tramadol constituted negligence under Maryland state law. The defendants moved to dismiss the state law claims, arguing that the federal court lacked jurisdiction or that the claims were insufficient under Maryland’s legal standards. Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

Maryland law sets stringent requirements for proving causation in birth injury cases, including standards governing the admissibility of expert testimony. In cases where expert opinions are deemed unreliable or lack a sound basis, courts may exclude such testimony, thereby precluding claims from proceeding. A recent Maryland case involving a birth injury highlights the necessity of presenting scientifically validated expert opinions when alleging medical negligence. If you believe your child’s injury resulted from medical negligence, you should consult with an experienced Maryland medical malpractice attorney who can clarify your legal rights.

Case Setting

It is alleged that the plaintiffs, the parents of a child born prematurely, filed a medical malpractice lawsuit against the defendant hospital, asserting that negligent prenatal care and delayed delivery led to their child’s severe brain injuries and subsequent diagnosis of spastic diplegic cerebral palsy. Reportedly, the mother initially presented at the hospital with decreased fetal movement at around 29 weeks of pregnancy. It is alleged that after several days of monitoring, the defendant’s doctors discharged her, citing normal fetal heart rate patterns.

Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

Maryland law allows people harmed by medical errors to seek compensation, but in order to demonstrate fault, they usually must offer expert testimony. However, in cases where the court deems expert testimony to lack a sound scientific basis, it may preclude such testimony from impacting the verdict. Recently, a court issued an opinion highlighting the standards courts apply to ensure the reliability of expert witnesses in cases involving allegations of medical negligence. If you believe you have been harmed due to a healthcare provider’s negligence, you should consult with a Baltimore medical malpractice lawyer promptly.

Case Setting

It is reported that the plaintiff sought to hold the defendant accountable for alleged medical errors after undergoing treatment that resulted in significant injuries. The plaintiff claimed that the defendant’s failure to follow established medical protocols during surgery led to her injuries, including long-term complications. As part of her case, the plaintiff introduced testimony from a medical expert who argued that the healthcare provider had deviated from the standard of care.

Allegedly, however, the defendant contested the admissibility of this testimony, asserting that the expert’s claims were speculative and lacked a factual basis. The trial court granted the defendant’s motion to exclude the expert’s testimony, finding that the opinions were not grounded in scientifically recognized standards. Without this testimony, the plaintiff was unable to substantiate her claims, leading the court to dismiss the case. The plaintiff appealed, challenging the exclusion of her expert’s testimony. Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

Under Maryland law, people harmed by negligent medical care can pursue damages via medical malpractice claims. They must comply with the statutory requirements, though, including filing a certificate of a qualified expert, and if they fail to do so, their claims may be dismissed. In a recent ruling, a Maryland court discussed the timeliness of expert certificates in a matter in which it ultimately rejected the plaintiff’s explanation for his delay. If you were hurt by the carelessness of a healthcare provider, you may be owed damages, and you should meet with a Baltimore medical malpractice attorney as soon as possible.

Factual and Procedural Background

It is reported that in 2018, the plaintiff, who has autism spectrum disorder, received treatment at the defendant’s facility. He claimed that during treatment, he was subjected to noise exposure therapy involving distressing and loud sounds, leading him to injure himself by hitting his head against a window. As a result, he alleged that he suffered a brain injury and experienced increased self-injurious behavior. In 2021, the plaintiff, through his mother, filed a medical malpractice claim in the Health Care Alternative Dispute Resolution Office (HCADRO), alleging the defendant’s negligence.

Allegedly, the plaintiff missed the statutory deadline to file a certificate of a qualified expert (CQE) but was granted an extension. He eventually submitted a letter from a doctor, which purported to serve as the CQE, and then filed multiple motions, including motions for summary judgment and extensions of time to file a new CQE. The defendant waived arbitration, and the case was transferred to the trial court. After reviewing the motions, the trial court denied the plaintiff’s requests and dismissed the case due to the plaintiff’s failure to file a compliant CQE. This dismissal led to the plaintiff’s appeal. Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

It is not uncommon for members of the United States military to seek medical care while they are serving. Sadly, such care does not always live up to expectations, and in some instances, lapses in medical judgment cause grave, and sometimes fatal, harm. Healthcare providers in the military who negligently harm patients can be held accountable, but claims against such providers may fall outside of the jurisdiction of the Maryland courts, as demonstrated in a recent ruling. If you suffered the loss of a loved one because of a healthcare provider’s recklessness, it is important to understand your rights, and you should consult a Baltimore medical malpractice attorney.

History of the Case

It is reported that the plaintiff, acting individually and on behalf of her deceased daughter, filed suit against the defendant, the United States, alleging medical malpractice under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) and violations of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). The plaintiff’s daughter, a military officer, died by suicide aboard a ship after being discharged from inpatient psychiatric treatment with a treatment plan that was not followed.

It is alleged that the plaintiff filed an administrative claim with the military in 2020, which was denied on the grounds that the standard of care was met. The plaintiff appealed the denial, but the Military Medical Malpractice Claims Appeals Board upheld the decision. The plaintiff then filed the current action, alleging that the military’s negligence and the mishandling of her administrative claim led to her daughter’s death. The United States moved to dismiss the case, arguing that the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction. Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

When people visit the emergency department of a hospital, they anticipate that they will receive an accurate diagnosis and timely and appropriate treatment. Sadly, though, it is not uncommon for emergency room physicians to overlook things like fractures, which usually results in exacerbation of the injury and other complications. When faced with medical malpractice claims, doctors who make such mistakes may attempt to shift blame to their injured patients, but as shown in a recent Maryland case, that can be challenging. If you were hurt by a doctor’s oversights, it is in your best interest to confer with a Baltimore medical malpractice attorney about your possible claims.

Fact of the Case and Procedural Setting

It is alleged that the plaintiff brought a medical malpractice action against the defendant, a physician, alleging negligence in diagnosing a fracture in her left foot when she visited the emergency department in July 2020. The plaintiff was diagnosed with a foot sprain, even though a fracture was visible on the x-ray, and was discharged without a cast or immobilizer. She later suffered a displaced fracture, which required surgery, which she claimed would have been avoidable if she received a proper diagnosis initially.

Reportedly, the defendant did not dispute the misdiagnosis but raised contributory negligence as a defense, arguing that the plaintiff failed to follow discharge instructions, which advised her to schedule a follow-up or return to the emergency department if her symptoms worsened. The plaintiff, experiencing worsening pain, did not seek further treatment until July 24, 2020, when the fracture was discovered. The defendant contended that the plaintiff’s failure to follow instructions contributed to the displacement. The plaintiff moved to preclude the defendant from relying on contributory negligence at trial.

Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

People who seek medical care have the right to receive timely and suitable treatment, regardless of the setting in which the care is provided. Sadly, many people housed in federal facilities fall victim to missed and delayed diagnoses, inappropriate treatment, and other acts of medical malpractice. While people harmed by such medical errors have the right to pursue claims against the parties that caused their injuries, they must adequately support such claims, or else they may be dismissed at the outset, as illustrated in a recent Maryland case. If you endured losses due to inadequate medical treatment, it is advisable to speak with a Baltimore medical malpractice attorney about your possible claims as soon as possible.

Procedural and Factual History

It is alleged that the plaintiff, who was housed in a federal facility, filed a medical malpractice lawsuit against the defendant, the medical director of the facility, alleging that the defendant was negligent in providing appropriate medical care. The plaintiff experienced chronic pain and mobility issues, which he claimed were inadequately addressed by the defendant.

According to the plaintiff, the failure to provide timely treatment and necessary interventions resulted in prolonged suffering and worsened his medical condition. Despite seeking medical assistance multiple times within the facility, the plaintiff argued that the treatment provided was substandard and amounted to negligence. After exhausting internal remedies, the plaintiff pursued legal action, asserting that the defendant’s failure to provide adequate medical care constituted medical malpractice. Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

Victims hurt by negligent medical treatment will often pursue claims against their providers. While they may be able to seek damages via other claims as well, they must offer facts sufficient to support such causes of action; otherwise, they will be dismissed. This was illustrated in a recent ruling in which the court found that the plaintiff’s medical malpractice claims were adequate to proceed, but his claims asserting violations of consumer protection laws were vague and general and, therefore, must be dismissed. If you suffered losses because of the carelessness of a medical professional, you have the right to seek compensation, and you should consult a Baltimore medical malpractice attorney.

History of the Case

It is alleged that the plaintiff, acting as power of attorney for the patient, filed a lawsuit against a hospital and three of its doctors, alleging negligence in the emergency medical care provided to the individual in June 2022. The patient, after experiencing severe chest pains, was transferred to the hospital, where he was diagnosed with an ascending aortic dissection and underwent emergency surgery. Post-surgery, the patient exhibited symptoms of confusion and disorientation, which the doctors noted but delayed in ordering an MRI to assess the potential neurological damage.

Reportedly, the MRI, conducted a week later, revealed that the patient had suffered a stroke, leading to significant long-term impairments. The plaintiff initially filed a complaint with two counts: medical malpractice and negligent infliction of emotional distress. The negligent infliction of emotional distress claim was later withdrawn and replaced with a consumer protection claim. The defendants moved to dismiss the consumer protection claim, leading to the court’s review. Continue Reading ›

Published on: | by

Medical malpractice can cause grave injuries that not only cause physical and emotional pain but also significant financial losses. Victims of medical malpractice can often recover damages for their harm via civil lawsuits, but the amount recoverable depends, in part, on the type of compensation granted and statutory damages caps. For example, in a recent Maryland case, a woman was awarded $1.5 million for harm sustained in an improperly performed gallbladder surgery, but her damages will be reduced in accordance with Maryland law. If you suffered losses because of the carelessness of a medical professional, you have the right to seek compensation, and you should consult a Baltimore medical malpractice attorney.

The Facts of the Case

It is reported that a medical malpractice suit adjudicated by a jury in St. Mary’s County resulted in a $1.5 million verdict against a hospital and its surgeon. The plaintiff, a woman who underwent gallbladder removal surgery, alleged that the surgeon had negligently left part of her gallbladder behind during the procedure. Following the initial surgery, the plaintiff experienced severe abdominal pain and multiple emergency visits. A CT scan performed in July 2021 revealed the presence of a remnant gallbladder.

Allegedly, subsequent medical evaluations and an additional surgery in April 2022 confirmed the remnant, which contributed to ongoing pain and required further surgical intervention. The hospital contended that the surgical difficulty was due to the patient’s unusual anatomy, though this was not documented in the surgical report. The plaintiff’s case included claims of negligence, asserting that the surgeon failed to recognize and address the incomplete removal and did not inform her of the partial procedure. Continue Reading ›

Contact Information
2002 Clipper Park Rd #300
Baltimore, MD 21211
Phone: (410) 889-1850Fax: (410) 235-3297

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Please do not include any confidential or sensitive information in a contact form, text message, or voicemail. The contact form sends information by non-encrypted email, which is not secure. Submitting a contact form, sending a text message, making a phone call, or leaving a voicemail does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Copyright © 2024, Arfaa Law Group
JUSTIA Law Firm Blog Design